|RE: Motorbiker |
|Budapest: 2018-10-30 23:13|
|Buenos Aires: 2018-10-30 19:13|
Praha: 2018-10-30 23:13
If I was a lawyer and part of the legal profession, I would have hastily uploaded the correction right immediately to ameliorate my mistake in the entry on Sunday. The perpetrator wasn'tlet on a probation periodbut his imprisonment was suspended for 4 years.During allowing a probation period no punishment is ruled immediately (65. § (1)), with suspended sentence it is; what was actually the case, he got 1 year and 10 months.
This is ordered by the 85. paragraph Suspended sentence; not to anyone's real surprise it also uses theprobation periodinteroperable, also shares many mutual content.
The processes aren't that much different either between the two formats: the probation period of the suspended sentence ends in a similar manner - 100.§/(1),d) Dismissal by law - except at the end of the probation period of the allowed probation period no punishment can be sentenced anymore. On the other hand suspended sentences could be dismissed just after the first year of the probation period: 101.§/(2) Dismissal by court.
The above professional mistake was irrelevant to any other circumstances or otherwise.